Month: October 2016

Why doctors need to be financially independent

Most people would want to become financially independent, but some of us want to be financially independent (FI) much earlier in life. There are plenty of reasons (including some very obvious ones) why anyone would want FI, but I’ve seen one consistent theme over the years regarding FI:

Work is more enjoyable if money is not a factor. 

I’ve wavered on this conclusion for years, and no matter how much I try to dismiss this notion, it keeps recurring. I see the most blatant of this in the doctors in my clinic. Many doctors gripe about having to see more patients. Often the finances dictate that in order to remain net neutral, a physician needs to see one more patient. Sometimes, it’s one more patient per day. Other times, it’s one more patient every other day. Is seeing one additional patient per day or week too onerous? Perhaps, but the interestingly, the doctors that fight the most about seeing one more patient often spend their weekends or vacations volunteering at free clinics!

How ironic is that?

 

[showads ad=responsive]

 

How can one logically refuse to see one more patient in a day of clinic yet be willing to spend an entire day doing the same thing pro bono?

Humans are illogical. I know doctors who come from significant levels of inherited wealth (read: several generations-worth of extreme wealth) who work at academic institutions at salaries in the tenth percentile of the expected norm. Frankly, I’ve never asked them why they do this, but my impression is that this particular type of job is absolutely rewarding for reasons other than financially. Kudos to them that they didn’t have to rack up over $148,000 in medical school debt.

With FI, you can always walk away 

Sometimes patient care is stressful. Sometimes the administrative aspects of medicine are stressful. Administration and insurance companies are the two aspects of medicine that I hate the most. Sometimes these are the factors that cause doctors to quit or retire.

If you are not working for the money, you can walk away from a bad practice situation without worrying about feeding your family. You could find other career options elsewhere without having to clamp down your finances. Hell, even if you don’t leave a bad practice situation, FI might allow you not to care so much about the small stuff.

Life is just better if your livelihood doesn’t depend on your day job. Period.

 life_is_better_without_money

Why would a doctor even want to retire early?  

The general population of doctors really do balk at the notion of early retirement. Why? We leave a relatively high income on the table by not working. A significant amount of our life is spent training to achieve our unique skill set. It would be a waste to curtail a potentially 25-30 year working career to do something else, especially if you had taken up a valuable medical school and residency spot from someone else who would have otherwise worked for thirty years.

The truth is that the goal of financial independence is not to quit early—it’s to allow yourself the option of not having to your job dictate your life. The premise of FI is that you can choose to do whatever the hell you wanted and still have enough to feed your family, take reasonable vacations and trips, and stay healthy and happy. It doesn’t mean that you take excessive luxury vacations every month.

For a doctor, this means that you can spend more time taking care of your patients, taking care of your family, and taking care of yourself. Most doctors I know actually like what they do.

What are you doing to get closer to FI?

 

Photo courtesy of Flickr.

Do you want to get the latest Smart Money MD posts in you inbox?
Get the FREE Smart Money MD Financial Cheatsheet for signing up!

How much net worth should be put into your house?

net worth homeGiven the easy access to credit that we have in the United States, it is easy to purchase a house that commands several times your salary. Physicians are prime customers for lenders, as we are low-risk clients who have high earning potential and stable jobs. Easy access to credit is also a curse for us, since it is incredibly easy to overextend our earning potential to buy a McMansion.

 

Consider your home as a stable asset.

Those who encourage us to maximize the amount of our net worth into our primary home (not just real estate) really seem to argue that our home is a stable asset. A house is unlikely to lose its value overnight. Even if it burns down or gets wiped out by a hurricane (assuming you have hurricane insurance), you can recover a large portion of the loss through insurance. We need a place to live anyway, so keeping part of your assets under your roof is a logical approach, right? If you need to withdraw cash out of your property, you can obtain a home equity line of credit (HELOC). Your home provides you with an additional “bucket” to store your wealth.

 

[showads ad=responsive]

 

How liquid is a home asset?

While you can withdraw your assets in your home from HELOCs and reverse mortgages, it may only be practical for one-time uncommon large-ticket purchases. It’s not like you can cash out your home to pay for hospital bills and a new car to move into an RV without having to sell your home outright. You can withdraw equity in the home relatively quickly, but you can’t unload it completely without selling it. And as we all know, you can’t force your home to be sold. What if you ended up getting a new job in a new city? Many doctors change jobs after purchasing a new home and end up having to pay a mortgage for a house that they can’t even enjoy.

The liquidity of homes are highly variable, even within the same market. Homes in the Bay Area move like hotcakes—I have a friend who sold his house in Burlingame, CA within a week after listing. Other homes in San Francisco can be sold before hitting the market. In contrast, higher priced homes (>$500,000) in second and third tier markets can sit for years before being sold. One of my friends in Iowa has had his $550,000 home in a Grade A school district sit on the market for over a year without any buyer interest, but another friend whose $600,000 updated home in a Grade B- school district in the same city sell within a few weeks.

What I’ve concluded so far is that you can’t rely on your home to be much of any asset. You have to get lucky and sell it quickly (preferably cash deal) in order to withdraw all of your equity in it.

 

How do I approach home ownership in terms of net worth?

Because of relatively instability in where we live and how our primary jobs turn out, I don’t consider a primary home an investment, only a luxury. While I am building equity while paying down my mortgage, I have not seen much of a tax benefit yet from tax deductions yet. Additionally, the cost of owning a home for me has been significantly higher than renting. I have to deal with broken fixtures, lawn work, and regular upkeep costs that I would not have had to worry about in a rental.

Ultimately once I own my property outright, I can breathe easier about the rest of the expenses. I do not reside in a highly competitive real estate market, so I do not expect my property value to rise significantly if I decide to sell and move out.

Do you intend to keep any part of your net worth in your primary residence?

 

(Photo courtesy of Flickr)